| |
|
|
|
| You Are Here:
Mesothelioma.net Blog > 2010 > September |
|
Archive for September, 2010
Thursday, September 30th, 2010
Early diagnosis prevails as the most recognized factor contributing to increased survival in mesothelioma patients. While the same can be said of many diseases, and specifically many cancers, it’s particularly true in the case mesothelioma owing to a variety of variables.
Mesothelioma, a cancer which affects primarily the area around the lungs, abdomen or heart, is caused by exposure to asbestos fibers. The disease takes varying amounts of time to develop from patient to patient, and has been known to occur in cases with widely differing levels of exposure to the dangerous mineral. One of the defining characteristics of the disease is its long latency period, or the unusual amount of time that it takes for malignant tumors to develop after exposure to asbestos fibers occurs. In some patients, it can take as long as fifty years for the disease to present from the time of initial exposure.
An early diagnosis occurs most often in patients who are younger, healthier, and more fit to recover from the harsh mesothelioma treatments prescribed by doctors who intend to attack the disease. The vast majority of mesothelioma patients are beyond retirement age and already experiencing failing health; as such their suggested treatments are often confined to palliative measures aimed at decreasing pain and discomfort rather than attacking the cancer itself. In the rare cases when the disease is diagnosed early, doctors may prescribe radical treatment regimens such as curative surgery combined with intra-pleural chemotherapy and radiotherapy – a harsh treatment which is difficult to recover from, but one intended to eradicate malignant tissues.
Limited spreading of the cancer is also a benefit of early diagnosis, in addition to relative youth and ability to recover. Mesothelioma which can be contained and treated in one, localized site is more likely to be effectively destroyed without causing irreparable collateral damage to the surrounding tissues.
Unfortunately, effecting an early diagnosis continues to be difficult. Last year the Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine contributed a study on improved diagnosis methods to the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. The study involved 167 volunteers and investigated the efficacy of measuring mesothelin in pleural fluids as a new method for mesothelioma diagnosis.
The study, like others of its kind, was promising but not practically applicable. The best method of early diagnosis still lies in patients discussing any history they have in the asbestos industry with their doctors, and completing a biopsy as soon as possible.
Posted in General | No Comments »
Wednesday, September 29th, 2010
Rosetta Genomics, a molecular diagnostics company, has developed a new test for mesothelioma which takes advantage of microRNA biomarkers. Biomarkers are pieces of genetic information expressed in the bloodstream or in tissue samples of patients which can help doctors and researchers to screen for specific responses in the body that correlate to certain illnesses, conditions or other phenomena that incite biological responses.
The test, which Rosetta Genomics is marketing as miRview meso, is performed on a tissue sample removed during a biopsy and takes about ten days to produce results. While the test is reported as incredibly accurate, it still relies on a biopsy – much like diagnostic tests for mesothelioma have in the past. This means that patients must first be identified as candidates for malignant mesothelioma before the test can take place – a process which relies heavily on a well informed, proactive patient.
Individuals who are suffering from mesothelioma symptoms should discuss any history of asbestos related work with their doctor, and should advocate accurate testing as soon as possible in order to avoid a late diagnosis. A late diagnosis can lead to reduced mesothelioma treatment options associated with short-term survival of the disease.
The test developed by Rosetta Genomics differentiates malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) from other carcinomas using microRNA, which is believed to be considerably more stable than other biomarkers. The tests, according to researchers, are an important part of a proper diagnosis which accompanies more effective treatment.
“Differentiating MPM from primary and metastatic carcinoma in the lung and pleura can be challenging for pathologists, even with the use of immunohistochemistry,” said the Medical Director and Head of Clinical Laboratory Research at Rosetta Genomics, Tina Edmonston, M.D. “There is no single immunohistochemical marker that distinguishes between MPM and various carcinomas that may be in the differential diagnosis. Moreover, the choice of markers, as well as interpretation of the results in equivocal cases can be subjective.”
“Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a very aggressive solid malignant tumor of the pleura that leads to a severe, clinically-symptomatic disease with very poor prognosis. Accurately distinguishing MPM from other carcinomas affecting the lung and pleura is important, as it guides treatment decisions, particularly for the newer immunomodulating and targeted therapeutics on the market and in development,” Dr. Edmonston continued.
Kenneth A. Berlin, President and CEO of Rosetta Genomics, praised the new test’s accuracy, saying: “We are especially pleased that these positive data underscore the accuracy of our miRview meso test and its ability to rule out MPM so that clinicians might access the most appropriate treatment options.”
Posted in News | No Comments »
Wednesday, September 22nd, 2010
Researchers in Baltimore have made a significant discovery concerning the behavior of mesothelioma in varying patients. Their findings may help them to predict patient responses to the disease, and possibly even control those responses in order to improve survival in those with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma.
Peritoneal mesothelioma refers to the formation of cancerous tumors in the mesothelial tissues of the abdominal cavity. Like other forms of mesothelioma, the disease is caused almost exclusively by asbestos fibers and is terminal in the overwhelming majority of cases. Unlike better known forms of the disease such as pleural mesothelioma, or mesothelioma of the lung lining, the mechanism which introduces the asbestos fibers to the area of the tumor is unknown. Some evidence suggests that peritoneal mesothelioma may result from the accidental ingestion of asbestos fibers, whereas pleural mesothelioma results from inhalation of the dangerous materials.
Patients suffering from peritoneal mesothelioma react to the disease in very different ways, a fact which lead researchers to further investigation. According to the Maryland researchers, “There is marked variability in its clinical behavior. Some patients die rapidly, and others survive for many years.”
The researchers believe that the differences in individual responses to the disease may lie in the expression of certain genes which affect the chemical “signals” transmitted to cells. In some patients, these signaling pathways cause cancerous tumors to grow and spread more rapidly, while in other patients the tumors appear to grow far slower. The researchers analyzed forty-one tissue samples from mesothelioma patients, and found that the “signaling chemicals” responsible for RNA production and protein synthesis differed between samples.
In one group the over-expression of certain pathways known as PI3K and the mammalian target of mTOR caused the presence of specific genes associated with a peritoneal mesothelioma survival of around 24 months. In patients where the same pathways and the genes which they are linked to were not present, survival rates were more than twice that time at some 69.5 months. When synthetic means were introduced to inhibit the expression of the PI3K and mTOR pathways, they found that the division and growth of cancerous cells was significantly impeded.
The scientists believed that further research into the significance of specific gene expression in peritoneal malignant mesothelioma patients was warranted. They asserted that the experiments already conducted highlight the importance of analyzing gene expression and further understanding the mechanisms that link these expressions with differing survival rates.
The study concluded: “Targeting the PI3K and mTOR signaling pathways may have significant therapeutic value in patients with MPM.”
Posted in Treatments | No Comments »
Tuesday, September 21st, 2010
Southwest Oncology Group, one of the largest clinical trial cooperative groups in the United States, is conducting a new trial whose aim is to further understand a specific chemotherapy regimen used to fight malignant pleural mesothelioma.
Mesothelioma is a cancer of the mesothelium, a soft tissue found around the lungs, abdomen and heart which encases organ systems and promotes their smooth function. Pleural mesothelioma refers to the cancer when it attacks the lining of the lungs, or the pleural mesothelium.
Mesothelioma is a terminal disease, and is caused almost exclusively by exposure to asbestos fibers. When asbestos fibers are accidentally inhaled or ingested, they travel through the victim’s body until they become lodged in the mesothelial tissues. Asbestos fibers trapped in the mesothelium cause a scarring reaction which can spur the growth of malignant tumors.
Cancers in the body spread through cell division, and often require the development of new blood vessels to supply the malformed tumor tissues and continue growth. Chemotherapy aims to inhibit certain enzyme actions that are required for these cells to divide, thus slowing or stopping the growth of the tumor.
Mesothelioma is commonly treated with a specific chemotherapy treatment made up of both pemetrexed and cisplatin. While this treatment has demonstrated enough efficacy to become a commonly accepted mesothelioma treatment route, in many cases its effects are disappointing or even negligible. The Southwest Oncology Group is currently testing the effect of adding a third chemotherapy treatment to the regimen, cediranib maleate. The new treatment made up of all three chemotherapy drugs is being tested in patients who have not been treated previously for malignant mesothelioma with either surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormonal therapy or any other form of treatment.
Cediranib maleate, which is also referred to as either AZD2171 or Recentin, is expected to stunt or stop the growth of new blood vessels which supply tumor growth with the nutrients necessary to grow and develop. This phase of the clinical trials, referred to as Phase I/II, is intended to study the side effects of the new treatment as well as discern the most effective dosage of the new additive.
Southwest Oncology Group is funded largely by the National Cancer Institute, and enrolls more than 6,000 cancer patients and healthy volunteers each year to study new drugs and treatment methods. Patients interested in participating in clinical trials of experimental drugs can contact the group for more details.
Posted in Treatments | No Comments »
Wednesday, September 15th, 2010
Obtaining an Upper Estimate of the Survival Benefit Associated with Surgery for Mesothelioma, a recent study which was published in the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, discusses in detail the benefits of radical surgery and multimodality therapy in treatment of malignant mesothelioma.
The study, conducted by M. Utley and colleagues of the University College London, concludes in a general sense that radical surgeries and multimodality treatments, where available, tend to improve patient survival by a substantial margin.
Malignant mesothelioma, or a cancerous tumor of the mesothelial tissue, is a terminal disease which is caused by exposure to toxic asbestos fibers. Asbestos fibers which are accidentally ingested or inhaled become lodged in the mesothelial tissues surrounding the lungs after slipping through the lung tissue itself. The fibers instigate a scarring-like reaction in the mesothelium which can develop into malignant tumors given enough time. Mesothelioma can take anywhere from ten to fifty years to develop after initial exposure, and often presents with vague, general symptoms.
The study headed by M. Utley compared the survival rates of several different sets of patients. Patients who underwent no surgery were compared with those who underwent three separate levels of increasingly radical treatment regimens. The three types of treatment covered in the study were as follows:
- Thoracotomy: An incision in the chest cut through which to remove a tumor
- Resection: Affected tissues and / or organs (mesothelium and sometimes lung) are completely removed
- Multimodality: Affected tissues are removed and the are is treated with a direct application of chemotherapy
The results showed that patients who did not undergo surgery survived a mean of 16.8 months, thoracotomy patients survived a mean of 17.8 months, resection patients survived a mean of 17 months and multimodality patients survived a surprising 32.9 months.
While the results appear to demonstrate that more radical surgeries produce better results, it’s important to know that younger, healthier patients tend to be better candidates for radical treatment, and that those patients are often expected to survive longer to begin with.
“Given the burden of morbidity of resection in the management of pleural mesothelioma,” concluded the researchers, “this most optimistic estimate of the magnitude of any survival benefit should be taken into account in any policy decision, in clinical trial proposals and in strategies adopted by clinical teams.”
Posted in News | No Comments »
|
|
|
|
|
|